<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/wp-content/themes/feed/atom.xsl"?>
<feed
        xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
        xmlns:wwe="http://release.wwe.com/atom/1.0"
        xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"
        xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
        xml:lang="en-US"
        xml:base="https://www.hsbattorneys.com/wp-atom.php"
	>
    <title type="text">Hein Schneider &amp; Bond P.C.</title>
    <subtitle type="text">Hein Schneider &#38; Bond P.C.</subtitle>

    <updated>2026-02-23T10:34:55Z</updated>

    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.hsbattorneys.com" />
    <id>https://www.hsbattorneys.com/feed/atom/</id>
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.hsbattorneys.com/feed/atom/?forceByPassCache=0.5491740023740972" />
	
	<generator uri="https://wordpress.org/" version="6.9.4">WordPress</generator>
<icon>/wp-content/uploads/sites/1204551/2025/10/cropped-HSB-fav-icon-32x32.jpg</icon>
        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Hein Schneider &amp; Bond P.C.</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Commercial litigation in St. Louis: Key trends for 2026]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.hsbattorneys.com/blog/2026/01/commercial-litigation-in-st-louis-key-trends-for-2026/" />
            <id>https://www.hsbattorneys.com/?p=49814</id>
            <updated>2026-01-21T16:47:39Z</updated>
            <published>2026-01-21T16:47:39Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[The commercial litigation scene in St. Louis is shaped by several key trends at the national and local levels. These developments are influencing how businesses approach disputes and manage their legal strategies. Key trends to anticipate in the coming year include the following.  #1: Increased focus on data privacy and cybersecurity With the rise of digital transformation, data privacy and…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.hsbattorneys.com/blog/2026/01/commercial-litigation-in-st-louis-key-trends-for-2026/"><![CDATA[<span style="font-weight: 400;">The commercial litigation scene in St. Louis is shaped by several key trends at the national and local levels. These developments are influencing how businesses approach disputes and manage their legal strategies. Key trends to anticipate in the coming year include the following. </span>
<h2><span style="font-weight: 400;">#1: Increased focus on data privacy and cybersecurity</span></h2>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">With the rise of digital transformation, data privacy and cybersecurity are a top concern. Businesses are facing increased scrutiny and potential litigation related to data breaches and privacy violations. Companies must take action to better ensure compliance with evolving regulations to mitigate risks.</span>
<h2><span style="font-weight: 400;">#2: Rise in contract disputes</span></h2>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">As businesses adapt to changing market conditions, contract disputes are becoming more prevalent. Companies are encountering challenges related to contract interpretation, performance, and enforcement. This trend underscores the importance of clear and precise contract drafting.</span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">In a recent example, SSM Health and UnitedHealthCare were in the midst of a contract dispute over patient coverage. The two healthcare giants </span><a href="https://www.firstalert4.com/2025/12/31/ssm-health-unitedhealthcare-announce-update-contract-dispute/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-wpel-link="external"><span style="font-weight: 400;">chose to extend</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> the current contract and continue negotiations. This tactic can help the parties gather additional information, complete thorough due diligence, and increase the odds of an amicable resolution.</span>
<h2><span style="font-weight: 400;">#3: Decreased reliance on agency expertise</span></h2>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">The Supreme Court’s decision to overturn </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">Chevron</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;"> will continue to impact the course of litigation nationwide as well as here in the St. Louis area. This is because the </span><a href="https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/06/supreme-court-strikes-down-chevron-curtailing-power-of-federal-agencies/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-wpel-link="external"><span style="font-weight: 400;">courts will now give</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> less deference to federal agencies, allowing businesses a better shot at a successful claim when going up against federal regulations. </span>
<h2><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bonus: Tips when preparing for litigation</span></h2>
<span style="font-weight: 400;">To effectively manage the complexities of commercial litigation, businesses should focus on comprehensive compliance programs, investment in cybersecurity, careful review of existing contracts and updates as needed as well as professional guidance when taking on local, state, and federal regulations. </span>

<span style="font-weight: 400;">The commercial litigation environment in St. Louis is becoming increasingly complex, with emerging trends that demand attention from businesses. By understanding these trends and </span><a href="https://www.hsbattorneys.com/commercial-litigation/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-wpel-link="internal"><span style="font-weight: 400;">taking proactive steps,</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> companies can navigate the legal landscape more effectively. As the legal environment continues to evolve, staying informed and adaptable will be key to thriving in the competitive business world.</span>]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by im-template</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Recent Missouri Case: Court Reaffirms That Inadequate Sale Price Is Not Enough To Set Aside Foreclosure Sale]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.hsbattorneys.com/blog/2022/07/recent-missouri-case-court-reaffirms-that-inadequate-sale-price-is-not-enough-to-set-aside-foreclosure-sale/" />
            <id>https://www.hsbattorneys.com/?p=48972</id>
            <updated>2022-07-29T15:46:14Z</updated>
            <published>2022-07-29T15:46:14Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[The Court of Appeals will correct errors and does not alter the law.  Here, the trial court voided a foreclosure sale because it concluded that the price “shocked the conscience.”  But “[i]nadequacy of consideration alone will not justify setting aside a foreclosure sale that was fairly and lawfully conducted, without fraud or partiality and with full opportunity for competitive bidding.” …]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.hsbattorneys.com/blog/2022/07/recent-missouri-case-court-reaffirms-that-inadequate-sale-price-is-not-enough-to-set-aside-foreclosure-sale/"><![CDATA[The Court of Appeals will correct errors and does not alter the law.  Here, the trial court voided a foreclosure sale because it concluded that the price "shocked the conscience."  But "[i]nadequacy of consideration alone will not justify setting aside a foreclosure sale that was fairly and lawfully conducted, without fraud or partiality and with full opportunity for competitive bidding."  Therefore, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's judgment.
<a href="https://hsbattorneys.us5.list-manage.com/track/click?u=c94dec84a9b2437b9b7ddc367&amp;id=6ba164907d&amp;e=71af027532" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Arvest Bank v. Emerald Pointe, LLC et al., SD36959</em></a>]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by im-template</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Recent Missouri Case: Tax Sale Does Not Extinguish Sewer District Lien]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.hsbattorneys.com/blog/2022/07/recent-missouri-case-tax-sale-does-not-extinguish-sewer-district-lien/" />
            <id>https://www.hsbattorneys.com/?p=48970</id>
            <updated>2022-07-21T22:27:46Z</updated>
            <published>2022-07-21T22:27:46Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Missouri Constitution’s Hancock Amendment bars political subdivisions from levying a tax without voter approval, but a sewer district’s bill based on an owner’s voluntary connection to the system is a fee, not a tax.  Further, Missouri statutes generally extinguish inferior assessments upon a delinquent tax sale, but specifically give the sewer district’s bill the same priority as State and county…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.hsbattorneys.com/blog/2022/07/recent-missouri-case-tax-sale-does-not-extinguish-sewer-district-lien/"><![CDATA[Missouri Constitution's Hancock Amendment bars political subdivisions from levying a tax without voter approval, but a sewer district's bill based on an owner's voluntary connection to the system is a fee, not a tax.  Further, Missouri statutes generally extinguish inferior assessments upon a delinquent tax sale, but specifically give the sewer district's bill the same priority as State and county taxes, which are superior to all other liens, and which are exempt from recording requirements, and which even survive a tax sale.
<a href="https://hsbattorneys.us5.list-manage.com/track/click?u=c94dec84a9b2437b9b7ddc367&amp;id=d2afa132c6&amp;e=71af027532" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Eclipse Property Development v. Ammari, et al., ED109298</em></a>]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by im-template</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[New Illinois Law: Special Warranty Deeds]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.hsbattorneys.com/blog/2022/07/new-illinois-law-special-warranty-deeds/" />
            <id>https://www.hsbattorneys.com/?p=48968</id>
            <updated>2022-07-15T14:27:21Z</updated>
            <published>2022-07-15T14:27:21Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[The Illinois legislature recently enacted House Bill 4270 which creates a statutory form for special warranty deeds to standardize what is certainly the most common form of deed used in commercial real estate practice. House Bill 4270]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.hsbattorneys.com/blog/2022/07/new-illinois-law-special-warranty-deeds/"><![CDATA[The Illinois legislature recently enacted House Bill 4270 which creates a statutory form for special warranty deeds to standardize what is certainly the most common form of deed used in commercial real estate practice.
<a href="https://hsbattorneys.us5.list-manage.com/track/click?u=c94dec84a9b2437b9b7ddc367&amp;id=73ed8a93da&amp;e=71af027532" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>House Bill 4270</em></a>]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by im-template</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Recent Missouri Case: Judgment Unclear on Easement Use and Obstacles]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.hsbattorneys.com/blog/2022/07/recent-missouri-case-judgment-unclear-on-easement-use-and-obstacles/" />
            <id>https://www.hsbattorneys.com/?p=48965</id>
            <updated>2022-07-08T19:15:22Z</updated>
            <published>2022-07-08T19:15:22Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[An easement over land has no effect on the servient estate holder except for the easement’s purpose, which prevails over any right of the servient estate holder, and which the servient estate cannon inhibit.  Further, a deed which reserves an easement, without specifying the easement’s purpose, entitles the easement’s holder to “unlimited reasonable use[.]”  A non-exclusive easement is one that the…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.hsbattorneys.com/blog/2022/07/recent-missouri-case-judgment-unclear-on-easement-use-and-obstacles/"><![CDATA[An easement over land has no effect on the servient estate holder except for the easement's purpose, which prevails over any right of the servient estate holder, and which the servient estate cannon inhibit.  Further, a deed which reserves an easement, without specifying the easement's purpose, entitles the easement's holder to "unlimited reasonable use[.]"  A non-exclusive easement is one that the servient estate holder may use, too.  Here, the trial court ordered the removal of structures on the easement despite evidence showing there was no interference with ingress and egress and allowed construction of road and utilities on the easement without specifying the width of the road.  Because the Court of Appeals could not tell from the evidence whether the trial court's judgment was "too broad or too narrow," it remanded the case to the trial court to determine the necessary width of the proposed road and utilities.

<a href="https://hsbattorneys.us5.list-manage.com/track/click?u=c94dec84a9b2437b9b7ddc367&amp;id=64a22a4990&amp;e=71af027532" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Kallash Revocable Inter Vivos Trust v. Fitzsimmons, ED109154</em></a>]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>by Hein Schneider &amp; Bond P.C.</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Recent Missouri Case: A Deed Will Not be Reformed Absent Mutual Mistake]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.hsbattorneys.com/blog/2022/06/recent-missouri-case-a-deed-will-not-be-reformed-absent-mutual-mistake/" />
            <id>https://www.hsbattorneys.com/?p=48959</id>
            <updated>2022-06-24T15:04:07Z</updated>
            <published>2022-06-24T14:26:26Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Reformation of a deed may occur upon the parties’ mutual mistake, meaning that “both have done what neither intended.”  The quantum of proof is clear, cogent, and convincing evidence.  Here, the trial court found that parents intended to convey a life estate in land to themselves, and a remainder to two of their children; but the deed added a third…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.hsbattorneys.com/blog/2022/06/recent-missouri-case-a-deed-will-not-be-reformed-absent-mutual-mistake/"><![CDATA[<div>Reformation of a deed may occur upon the parties' mutual mistake, meaning that "both have done what neither intended."  The quantum of proof is clear, cogent, and convincing evidence.  Here, the trial court found that parents intended to convey a life estate in land to themselves, and a remainder to two of their children; but the deed added a third child to the remainder by the parents' scrivener's error.  The Court found that the error constituted a unilateral mistake, which supports reformation only when concealed by bad faith conduct, which is absent from the pleadings and record.  Accordingly, the Court did not allow the deed to be reformed.</div>
<em><a href="https://mcusercontent.com/c94dec84a9b2437b9b7ddc367/files/aba53b2b-9b22-8414-3473-9c57a0950a08/Lillian_Singleton_v._Sheila_Singleton.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" data-cke-saved-href="https://mcusercontent.com/c94dec84a9b2437b9b7ddc367/files/aba53b2b-9b22-8414-3473-9c57a0950a08/Lillian_Singleton_v._Sheila_Singleton.pdf" data-wpel-link="external">Lillian Singleton v. Sheila Singleton, et al., SD37106</a> </em>]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Hein Schneider &amp; Bond P.C.</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Recent Missouri Case: Scope of Attorney/Client Privilege Discussed]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.hsbattorneys.com/blog/2021/11/recent-missouri-case-scope-of-attorney-client-privilege-discussed/" />
            <id>https://www.hsbattorneys.com/?p=48629</id>
            <updated>2022-06-09T07:39:16Z</updated>
            <published>2021-11-19T14:45:36Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[When an action for negligence is filed against an insured, and the insurer has control over the claim, a fiduciary duty to the insured is created. In this case, the possibility of a verdict in excess of the policy limits caused the insurer to suspect that the insured was guilty of a bad faith refusal to settle. The insurer then…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.hsbattorneys.com/blog/2021/11/recent-missouri-case-scope-of-attorney-client-privilege-discussed/"><![CDATA[When an action for negligence is filed against an insured, and the insurer has control over the claim, a fiduciary duty to the insured is created. In this case, the possibility of a verdict in excess of the policy limits caused the insurer to suspect that the insured was guilty of a bad faith refusal to settle. The insurer then retained counsel to review the bad faith suspicion who also ended up participating in the insured's defense in the negligence action and so became, at least in part, the insured's negligence counsel. Therefore, matters which were outside of the retained counsel's representation regarding the suspicion of bad faith may be subject to discovery by the insured, unless protected by immunities for confidential communications or work product. At issue were certain discovery orders concerning the insured's requests for information and documents. Here, the Court of Appeals found that the trial court erred in quashing the discovery subpoena outright and remanded the case with direction to the trial court to review documents in camera which may be protected and which may not.

<em><a href="https://hsbattorneys.us5.list-manage.com/track/click?u=c94dec84a9b2437b9b7ddc367&amp;id=49ba49e71e&amp;e=71af027532" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">State ex rel Kilroy Was Here, ED109351</a> </em>]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Hein Schneider &amp; Bond P.C.</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Recent Illinois Case: Mortgage Foreclosure]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.hsbattorneys.com/blog/2021/11/recent-illinois-case-mortgage-foreclosure/" />
            <id>https://www.hsbattorneys.com/?p=48627</id>
            <updated>2022-06-09T07:39:29Z</updated>
            <published>2021-11-12T14:48:04Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Here, the trial court granted summary judgment against a foreclosing bank on the finding that it did not have standing because of the timing of an assignment of the mortgage to the bank and when the foreclosure action was filed. Thereafter, when the borrowers defaulted on the loan, the bank filed a second foreclosure action and, in response, the borrowers…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.hsbattorneys.com/blog/2021/11/recent-illinois-case-mortgage-foreclosure/"><![CDATA[Here, the trial court granted summary judgment against a foreclosing bank on the finding that it did not have standing because of the timing of an assignment of the mortgage to the bank and when the foreclosure action was filed. Thereafter, when the borrowers defaulted on the loan, the bank filed a second foreclosure action and, in response, the borrowers filed a motion to dismiss on grounds that the previous summary judgment barred the second action. However, the court surmised that the second action did not arise from the same operative facts as the first action because the borrowers defaulted on the loan after the summary judgment. Therefore, the borrowers' defaults on the loan barred the application of res judicata and the bank could proceed with foreclosure.

<a href="https://hsbattorneys.us5.list-manage.com/track/click?u=c94dec84a9b2437b9b7ddc367&amp;id=4d93139caf&amp;e=71af027532" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Coghlan, 2021 IL App (3d) 190701</em></a>]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Hein Schneider &amp; Bond P.C.</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Recent Case: Boundary by Acquiescence Explained]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.hsbattorneys.com/blog/2021/11/recent-case-boundary-by-acquiescence-explained/" />
            <id>https://www.hsbattorneys.com/?p=48625</id>
            <updated>2022-06-09T07:39:36Z</updated>
            <published>2021-11-05T18:04:13Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[In an action to quiet title based on adverse possession, the evidence that supported findings of actual, open and notorious, or exclusive possession included that the adverse possessor had cleared and maintained the disputed tract, fenced it in with hot wire, and rented it out for agricultural purposes. Maintaining a fence and posting signs against trespassing are not absolutely necessary to maintaining…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.hsbattorneys.com/blog/2021/11/recent-case-boundary-by-acquiescence-explained/"><![CDATA[In an action to quiet title based on adverse possession, the evidence that supported findings of actual, open and notorious, or exclusive possession included that the adverse possessor had cleared and maintained the disputed tract, fenced it in with hot wire, and rented it out for agricultural purposes. Maintaining a fence and posting signs against trespassing are not absolutely necessary to maintaining a claim for adverse possession. Further, the time for adverse possession may begin with an agreement on an otherwise uncertain boundary, the presumption of which arises on proof of long acquiescence to that boundary line.
<a href="https://hsbattorneys.us5.list-manage.com/track/click?u=c94dec84a9b2437b9b7ddc367&amp;id=9d60fcbf7a&amp;e=71af027532" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Coleman v. Hartman, WD83925</em></a>]]></content>
						        </entry>
	        <entry>
            <author>
									                    <name>On Behalf of Hein Schneider &amp; Bond P.C.</name>
				            </author>
            <title type="html"><![CDATA[Recent Cases: Adverse Possession Not Shown]]></title>
            <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.hsbattorneys.com/blog/2021/10/recent-cases-adverse-possession-not-shown/" />
            <id>https://www.hsbattorneys.com/?p=48622</id>
            <updated>2022-06-09T07:39:42Z</updated>
            <published>2021-10-29T18:35:44Z</published>
					<taxo:topics><![CDATA[-]]></taxo:topics>
            <summary type="html"><![CDATA[When challenging a finding for lack of substantial evidence, the appellant must address all evidence favoring the ruling, and show that such evidence is not substantial. The elements of adverse possession include actual and hostile possession, for which respondent’s supporting evidence included fencing, farming, and otherwise using the disputed land, including for access to respondent’s back acreage. Here, the appellants…]]></summary>
			                <content type="html" xml:base="https://www.hsbattorneys.com/blog/2021/10/recent-cases-adverse-possession-not-shown/"><![CDATA[When challenging a finding for lack of substantial evidence, the appellant must address all evidence favoring the ruling, and show that such evidence is not substantial. The elements of adverse possession include actual and hostile possession, for which respondent's supporting evidence included fencing, farming, and otherwise using the disputed land, including for access to respondent's back acreage. Here, the appellants failed to address the evidence which favored the ruling and therefore failed to show that such evidence was not substantial.  Therefore, the trial court's judgment finding adverse possession was affirmed.

<a href="https://hsbattorneys.us5.list-manage.com/track/click?u=c94dec84a9b2437b9b7ddc367&amp;id=c2ee0b8fd6&amp;e=71af027532" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>McElvain v. Stokes, WD83737</em></a>]]></content>
						        </entry>
	</feed>