HSB Attorney Trent Bond represented the purchaser of real property at a foreclosure sale in an action seeking to set aside that foreclosure sale and to quiet title in his name. The Plaintiff brought his claim because he believed that the sale was procedurally improper due to an alleged lack of notice and because the Plaintiff, the Lender, and a third-party had an alleged preexisting agreement whereby the third-party would purchase the defaulted Note from the Lender to avoid foreclosure. Trent ultimately moved for Summary Judgment in favor of the foreclosure purchaser. Upon hearing argument, the Court granted the Motion for Summary Judgment determining that Plaintiff not only had proper notice of the foreclosure sale but was present when the sale was being called. The Court further determined that even had there been some preexisting lender-borrower agreement to sell the Note in lieu of foreclosure, it was not binding on the foreclosure sale purchaser nor on the subsequent purchasers who now hold title to the property because they had no knowledge of such arrangement.
HSB Attorney Obtain Summary Judgment
HSB Attorney Obtain Summary Judgment
On Behalf of Hein Schneider & Bond P.C. | Sep 4, 2020 | Firm News |
Recent Posts
- Recent Missouri Case: Court Reaffirms That Inadequate Sale Price Is Not Enough To Set Aside Foreclosure Sale
- Recent Missouri Case: Tax Sale Does Not Extinguish Sewer District Lien
- New Illinois Law: Special Warranty Deeds
- Recent Missouri Case: Judgment Unclear on Easement Use and Obstacles
- Recent Missouri Case: A Deed Will Not be Reformed Absent Mutual Mistake
Archives
- July 2022
- June 2022
- November 2021
- October 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- March 2020
- October 2019
- August 2019
- January 2019
- November 2018
- July 2018
- January 2018
- October 2017
- September 2017
- May 2017
- February 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- July 2015
- April 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- October 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- December 2012
- October 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- December 2008
Categories
- Adverse Possession
- Agency Defalcation
- Appellate Proceedings
- Banking
- Banking Litigation
- Business Formation
- Business Litigation
- Claims Analysis & Resolution
- Closing Escrow Disputes
- Commercial & Industrial Leasing
- Commercial Lending & Borrowing
- Commercial Litigation
- Corporate & Business Law
- Curing Title Defects
- Defending the Insurer In Litigation
- Development
- Easement & Access Disputes
- Employment Disputes
- Equitable Liens & Subrogation
- Firm News
- Fraud & Forgery
- Grant Mabie
- Insurance Defense
- John Hein
- Judicial Foreclosure
- Lease Disputes
- Lien Priority Disputes
- Major Claims
- Mechanics Lien Litigation
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Municipal Law & Litigation
- Paul Simon
- Policy Coverage Analysis
- Priority Disputes
- Purchase & Sale Agreements
- Quiet Title
- Real Estate & Title Insurance
- Real Estate Financing
- Real Estate Litigation
- Real Estate Transactions
- Recoupment
- Reformation of Instruments
- Sarah Holdener
- Shareholder Disputes
- State & Municipal Law
- Stewart Schneider
- Surety & Fiduciary
- Tax Sales
- Title Insurance
- Trenton Bond
- Uncategorized
- William Sauerwein